CGOA model with T, S, and velocity nudging

These results are featured in a manuscript submitted to Progress in Oceanography.

Features of This Run

  • NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis winds
  • NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis heat flux
  • Integrated freshwater input along the coast
  • Susitna and Copper River discharge
  • Vertical S coordinates manipulated so that top layer is constant depth across the entire domain
  • Initial temperature and salinity fields from Levitus data
  • Nudging of temperature and salinity to Levitus data
  • Nudging of barotropic velocity to output from SEOM
  • Simulation of time period August - October, 1996
  • Lower vertical background mixing for tracers, higher viscosity, and shorter 2D timestep to improve stability.

Results

Velocity and Temperature Salinity and Sea Surface Height
1996 with continued UV nudging (A)
1996 without continued UV nudging (B)
Click images to start animations

Subtidal Nudging Schemes

We tested two different nudging schemes. Both focused forcing in the telescoping regions that are south and west of the finely resolved region of interest.

Experiment A began 5 days before the end of July when an initialization run was spun up with TS nudging to climatology and subtidal, barotropic U and V nudging to SEOM results over a region that included the entire finely resolved area, and extended to point 10 in the telescoping region, ramping to zero at the western and southern walls. A subsequent 90 day run began on August 1, using the initialization results as initial conditions. This run had a nudging area whose coefficient varied from 0 at walls, max nudgcoft (.1/86400) at point 10, and 0 again at edge of finely resolved area nudging TS and subtidal velocity.

Experiment B was initialized on August 1 the same way that Experiment A was. During this 90 day run, TS was nudged in the nudging zone described above, but subtidal velocity was not. This run was intended as a basis from comparison for the continued nudging to SEOM results.


Nudging area for 90 day subtidal run. Darker grey indicates larger nudging coefficient, and blue denotes land.

General Description of Results

The differences between the results of the two nudging schemes are small, except along the southeast slope. Features propagating into the region from the south are dissipated into the 200 km scale eddy field, rather than continuing to propagate along the shelf break through the whole domain. This dissipation might be due to the complex bathymetry in the region, or it may be that the model's 22 km resolution is not fine enough to faithfully reproduce Coastal-Trapped Wave dynamics.

To CGOA modeling overview
To descriptions of input data

HOME
Contents last updated
Liz Dobbins - dobbins@pmel.noaa.gov