Dear ferreters,
Thank you for updating v7.6 to fix the variable-variable[@AVE] shown as compressed gird problem.
However, when I applied @DIN to variable-variable[@AVE], it still shows a very different result from variable-number. For instance:
list/l=9 VA_4CO2_CAM3_MONTHLY_AVAV[J=9]
VARIABLE : VA_4CO2_CAM3_MONTHLY_DIN[K=@AVE]
LONGITUDE: 1.4W(-1.4) to 1.4W(358.6)
LATITUDE : 65.6S
Z (Pa) : 500 to 103750
TIME : 16-SEP 00:00 NOLEAP
85926.
So the ave value is 85926.
Then I compare:
list/j=9/l=9 test,test7
Z (Pa): 500 to 103750
LONGITUDE: 1.4062W(-1.4062) to 1.4062W
LATITUDE: 65.578S
TIME: 16-SEP 00:00 NOLEAP
Column 1: TEST is VA_4CO2_CAM3_MONTHLY_DIN[J=9]-VA_4CO2_CAM3_MONTHLY_AVAV[J=9]
Column 2: TEST7 is VA_4CO2_CAM3_MONTHLY_DIN[J=9]-85926
TEST TEST7
1000 / 1: 4.964E+06 4.456E+06
2000 / 2: 2.687E+06 2.179E+06
...
The results are quite different. And if I apply @DIN:
list/j=9/l=9 test[Z=1000:2000@DIN],test7[Z=1000:2000@DIN]
LONGITUDE: 1.4062W(-1.4062) to 1.4062W
LATITUDE: 65.578S
Z (Pa): 1000 to 2000 (integrated)
TIME: 16-SEP 00:00 NOLEAP
Column 1: TEST is VA_4CO2_CAM3_MONTHLY_DIN[J=9]-VA_4CO2_CAM3_MONTHLY_AVAV[J=9]
Column 2: TEST7 is VA_4CO2_CAM3_MONTHLY_DIN[J=9]-85926
TEST TEST7
I / *: 0.0000 3.317E+09
The 0 value does not make sense to me. I am wondering what happened in this process.
Thank you in advance.
--